Posts from I would like to see the persimmon tree. Auto-translated

Thought it would be worse.
1 — 2 Awful proportions, something terrible seems to have happened with the ribs, but the face and color scheme are tolerable.
2 — 3 Puffy, pale, small facial features, and large udders.
3 — 7 Pleasant, excellent figure, the image is good, but the drawing is a bit rough, it looks artificial, almost plastic.
4 — 4 On the contrary, this one is too lively, unfortunately... I'll just give a plus to my brother, the academicophile.
5 — 1 I don't like the ears, udders, stoop, and bob cut.
6 — 2 The setting and hair color are unappealing.
7 — 2 The setting and proportions are fine, but the face is just a complete failure. Even in 2D, it looks ungraceful and rough.
8 — 6 I'm not a fan of the sickly, red-eyed look, but I really like this expression of total hatred for humanity. The drawing is also good.
9 — 8 As one successful character said, Sonatka is quite good. I'll add one point, just to make it an eight (it's a shame it's only one point...).
10 — 4 This generic, half-baby-face is the reason for hundreds of artworks being rejected on Pinterest. And it's also too plump.
11 — 2 What even is this?
12 — 4 Pleasant smile and hairstyle, but the udders, tan, and squareness spoil it a lot.
13 — I sent it just because of the old-school Tolchkov vibe. And the hair.

up to 10

🤣

incels, when they see a real-life girl with short hair: 🤢
incels, when they see an anime girl with short hair: 😍

incels, when they see a real-life girl: 🤢
incels, when they see an anime girl: 😍

1. 10 Actually, I like this seemingly modest drawing the most. I have no idea why I like it so much, but it deserves the highest score.
2. 2 Most likely, it's AI-generated, but I could be wrong. +1 point for the theoretical chance of error.
3. 4 If we ignore the hair color, I should theoretically like it, but for some reason, I don't. I look at it and it doesn't appeal to me. Alas and alack!
4. 1 Apparently, this is an attempt to impress with a classic portrait. +1 point for using something other than anime.
5. 1 I don't like it at all. I usually like girls with ears and tails, but not in this case.
6. 1 Genshin, and not in the best execution.
7. 1 What is this?
8. 5 Atmospheric, but otherwise mediocre.
9. 10 Related to Rinze.
10. 1 AI-generated.
11. 7 Atmospheric, gloomy. Unfortunately, that's all.
12. 1 What is this goblin in headphones... Well, you've seen it, haven't you?!
13. 6 It seems okay, but somehow it's blurry. This spoils my impression. Who said that this is also different from anime? I don't remember giving scores based on that.)

I already feel sorry for those who sent it.

Will there be any downsides?

Astral, in your opinion, who submitted the best artwork?

No idea. Except for 13, it has already been revealed.

1 - 3, the face isn't appealing, and there's not much to look at in the upper part. 2 - 2, the anti-AI inquisition is watching. +1 point for being better than other options from this artist. 3 - 4, they have pants, but no positive characteristics were included. 4 - 5, it's okay. 5 - 8, I see a place for my head. 6 - 6, I used to like this art, but now I look at it, and this swimsuit seems creepy (not for cultural reasons). 7 - 3, let her hair down, give her a skirt instead of pants, make the face softer, and it would be good, but as it is, no. 8 - 9, this one was in my art folder with all sorts of cool stuff... I really like the eyes. 9 - 10 - 1, the anti-AI inquisition is watching; Ment had better ones at level zero. 11 - 6, for the fingers. 12 - 6, for the belly. 13 - 6, for the feminine image.

And are these AIs with us now, in this room? I just don't understand how you identify them.

They hide their fingers + the style is as generic fantasy/anime as possible.

You look at it and feel that it lacks soul.

As a rule, there are characteristic elements that can be used to identify them. Sometimes it's the style. Sometimes it's simply "strange" elements, such as incorrect shadows, clothing items, highlights, and blurred inscriptions.

1 — 5. I don't like the appearance, but the art itself is of good quality. 2 — 4. Generic. 3 — 7. This is my style, but not my costume or the drawing style. 4 — 5. I don't like the style, but it's not repulsive. 5 — 9. 😍🍗 6 — 5. Cute and generic. 7 — 6. I like the face, but not the costume. 8 — 9 — 7. I would give this a 9 as an avatar in the character list, by the way... 10 — 4. Generic. 11 — 8. Just a very pleasant art style. 12 — 6. I like the face, but not the pants. 13 — 5. A bit gloomy.

It seems like I'm the one creating the images, but calculating the AI-generated art is difficult for me; I almost submitted my own work instead, but I swapped them out at the last moment.

Damn it. So, half of those infamous ten hours were wasted scrolling through completely unhuman-made content? It's time to create a neo-Luddite party, otherwise, this century will end up like in the song 2525.

1 - You need to know the character to understand the reference, etc. As for the art itself, I'd give it a 4/10.
2 - I can't tell the difference between neural network-generated art pieces. Overall, it's a 7/10.
3 - I like it; there's a sense of dynamism in the picture, 8/10.
4 - Okay, it's quite beautiful, 6/10.
5 - In my opinion, it's just a mech. 2/10.
6 - Well, the goat was my favorite character in Genshin Impact, so I'll give it an extra point. Although there are better art pieces out there. 8/10.
7 - This is a boy who put cotton wool under his corset. 2/10.
8 - Something very strange, 1/10.
9 - Ah, this looks like that game where anime girls are ships. Is that Chapaev? Although the flag hints at car racing. Not bad overall, 5/10.
10 - I get it, it's AI because of the fingers on the hand and the lack of a second hand? Well, then 3/10.
11 - What was that? 1/10.
12 - Some kind of creepy generic thing, 2/10.
13 - It's okay, it's about the same level as the first art piece, 4/10