Posts from What should I do?

Yesterday, I was watching the evening news, and it made me really want to be there and ask Igor Mintusov (or whatever his last name is) a purely theoretical question. Here's the situation: In Belarus, on the border with Poland, there are 5,000 people. They are all adult men. They all say that there is a war going on in their homeland, that their homes are being destroyed, that they are in great danger, and so on – everything Solovyov said. They now want to go through Poland to Germany and seek asylum there. It is definitely known that 4,999 of them are lying and are actually going to Germany for a better life: social benefits, easy work with high pay, or they simply want to live off benefits and do nothing. In other words, as Igor said, they are migrants, not refugees. But one of them is telling the truth, and he really will be in danger if he is deported, and there is a high probability that he could even die, so he is, in fact, a refugee. However, it is impossible to determine which of these 5,000 is the unfortunate one. How should these people be treated if there are only two options: 1) grant asylum in Germany, 2) send them back? There are no other options, and I don't even want to consider any other opinions.

Cringe...

In my opinion, you shouldn't be involved in anything related to Poland, Belarus, or, especially, Germany.

And you will never be allowed to make any decisions.

There are only two options: 1) provide asylum in Germany, 2) send them back? There is nothing else, and I don't even want to consider or discuss any other opinions.

I have a third option, but it's more for you and this topic.

Of course, I will provide it! Everyone will benefit from this.

I stepped away from the forum for a bit, and now they're arguing about politics again >_>

There is a third option – to leave them in Belarus and grant them citizenship. Alexander Grigorievich has a positive attitude towards this:

There is no third option. They want to go to Germany! (And they are not the only ones).