Posts from Who is stronger, those who rely on swords or magic? (Follow-up to the poll: Who has sufficiently powerful magic?)

Well, not exactly Barbarians. Because there is magic. But in Heroes 4, Barbarians don't have any magic at all. And that's because the hero isn't a priest, but a Knight.

Well, not exactly Barbarians. Because there is magic. And in Heroes 4, there is no magic at all for the Barbarians. And all because the hero is not a priest, but a Knight.

It seems strange to me that the Haven unit has a stronger attack than the Sylvan unit! The Sylvan troops are much better, in my opinion! Of course, if you turn the entire Haven army into Paladins, then only Griffins and Archangels will remain, and you can practice revenge against them!

If you divide them into trained and untrained units, with 6 stacks each, it would be quite effective, considering the number. I don't remember if they will all fit, though.
For Sylvan, the pure warrior units are the dancer, hunters, and ents.

Yes, but these little bastards will be slaughtered by the elves like puppies, due to their ability to retaliate!

The hero in Haven has a very good chance of increasing both attack and defense (30% chance for attack and 45% for defense), while in Sylvan, the stats tend towards Defense and Knowledge (45% and 30% respectively).

Key takeaway: knowledge is needed for magic, meaning humans will specialize in swordsmanship more than elves and all other races.

The faction that focuses the most on army enhancement (Might & Magic) is, naturally, Haven (A-30%, S-45%), followed by Sylvan (A-15%, S-45%), and in third place, with a minimal difference from the forest elves, are Inferno (A-45%, S-10%), Necropolis (A-10%, S-30%), and Dungeon (A-30%, S-10%) in fourth place, and at the very end of the list are the Academy (A-10%, S-15%).

Well, I don't know, I admired Humans for a long time until I could use Elves to unleash their vengeance! I approve of all your opinions and calculations, but you won't convince me!