Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Fomenko is 100% right. Unfortunately, nowadays history is being written (and most importantly, published!!!) by anyone who feels like it and believes they are opening everyone's eyes. It's better not to even analyze their "works," otherwise... it will definitely end badly. You won't find any references to sources or even the slightest hint of understanding history in general. For such "authors," history is something like a fantasy world.
I won't argue about the matriarchy, as I don't have the opportunity to delve into it in detail right now. But I still think it existed somewhere in the archaic period. However, it was underdeveloped, and that's why it was replaced by a more "productive" patriarchy.
P.S. AlexeyPank, how was your exam session? Did it end?