WT Nostalgy

HellLighT (Blue, Swamp, Brokhild) def Tofsla (Red, Necropolis, Galtran). Mini-nostalgia 124

We defended all the respawn points; on the computer's respawn point and my own, it yielded 2 hives and a consulate. Starting from 121, I began gathering resources, and by 124, I was in Flaks' treasure zone, preparing to take the library. I had 2 hives + boots, as well as Dragon Utopia. I would have taken it on turn 125, but my opponent rushed and unsuccessfully tried to kill ГО with 10 lords using Thunderbirds. He surrendered. Thanks for the game.

P.S. The decision was ultimately made by Mee, because I am an interested party, but this kind of thing – "oh, can I use autosave or did I slightly break the rules?" (I’m generally saying that I’ve seen/heard this more than once on the Wargaming Tournament platform, not about this specific situation) – is complete nonsense. This is a money tournament; you shouldn't make actions if you are unsure. If you didn't read the regulations carefully, reread them (when I doubt something, that's what I do). For any controversial issue, contact the hosts and judges. Why did you assume that violating the rules should be ignored? In ongoing tournaments, defeats were awarded immediately and for less serious offenses.
On my part, I already wrote that I was wrong to present my opinion as the only correct one, and also got carried away while discussing the opponent's actions, although now you are doing no better with your own comments.
P.P.S. Regarding reviewing all games in a row, it is clear that addressing save reviews requires concrete, substantial arguments confirmed by some action during the game. I believe that I raised the question not without reason; there were questions, I sent them to the judge for review regarding possible unfair play. If you think that assessing it requires only saving from one day, you are mistaken; a full analysis of the game is being conducted, and no one intends to turn a blind eye to violations (unless the opponent himself objects).