Maphacking did not occur. The game results are voided, and a replay is required with broadcasts from both sides to avoid a recurrence of the conflict!
It's great that Mee dug so deep and found a violation on turn 116 (which was clearly unintentional for all the players).
But
1) The decision clearly favors one player.
2) I believe the decision is unjustified and biased.
3) It's unclear on what basis Mee is investigating the game from day one, when we're talking about maphacking on the third week.
In my opinion, in Mee's decision, Tofsla suffered, while Hellight benefited: both violated the rules insignificantly, but Hellight received a warning, while Tofsla had his victory taken away.
P.S. Now Tofsla has two options: withdraw from the tournament or obviously lose the second game.
P.P.S. Question for Mee: can I also make an unfounded accusation against Hellight for maphacking and be sure that our entire game with him, starting from day one, will also be checked for violations regarding the collection of resources by the opponent while bypassing the guards? I also want something, and I'm not risking anything!