Драккошка
Auto-translated
I've been slacking off lately, watching all sorts of dumb cartoons.
Doesn't quite live up to its name.
+ Great graphics, character and location design. There isn't any outright bad design; there might be some that's a little lacking, but overall, everything is in its place. The plot is typical, but it didn't annoy me.
- I'll complain a bit about the awful translation of the term "leafman/leafmen," even though in other cases, they managed to come up with something more or less adequate. Although I usually watch dumb cartoons dubbed and don't complain, it's quite an honor for them to make me specifically look for the original version, pfft.
= 9/10. Pleasant visuals, overall a good watch.
I regretted it halfway through the first part, but looking for another dumb cartoon would mean spending three hours and not drawing anything in that time, and without any guarantee that the alternative would be better.
+ Well, at least it's different from 95% of Hollywood cartoons (remember the plot template, yeah).
- Unpleasant character and location design, the same jokes repeated a hundred times don't become funnier (although some parts were still amusing), the amazing logic of some moments (if even I noticed the amazing logic, then it's very bad; I usually don't nitpick such things, but what do I expect from a dumb cartoon anyway, it's not Babylon 5, and it's a pain to keep track of).
= 2/10. It could have been worse, but at least I got some drawing done.
"Lord of the Rings" sucks... Well, actually, that's not objective at all, considering my passionate love for the Lord of the Rings universe and everything related to it. But this cartoon is really cool.
+ Owls are like cats, only birds. Amazing graphics, design, atmosphere, everything.
- Well, I don't know, everything seems cool, but something seems off. Oh, and there's also a hint of a sequel, but there isn't one. That's disappointing.
= 9/10, amazing, but not a 10. I felt like humanizing all the characters, but something's off, they're fine as owls.
Doesn't quite live up to its name.
+ Great graphics, character and location design. There isn't any outright bad design; there might be some that's a little lacking, but overall, everything is in its place. The plot is typical, but it didn't annoy me.
- I'll complain a bit about the awful translation of the term "leafman/leafmen," even though in other cases, they managed to come up with something more or less adequate. Although I usually watch dumb cartoons dubbed and don't complain, it's quite an honor for them to make me specifically look for the original version, pfft.
= 9/10. Pleasant visuals, overall a good watch.
I regretted it halfway through the first part, but looking for another dumb cartoon would mean spending three hours and not drawing anything in that time, and without any guarantee that the alternative would be better.
+ Well, at least it's different from 95% of Hollywood cartoons (remember the plot template, yeah).
- Unpleasant character and location design, the same jokes repeated a hundred times don't become funnier (although some parts were still amusing), the amazing logic of some moments (if even I noticed the amazing logic, then it's very bad; I usually don't nitpick such things, but what do I expect from a dumb cartoon anyway, it's not Babylon 5, and it's a pain to keep track of).
= 2/10. It could have been worse, but at least I got some drawing done.
"Lord of the Rings" sucks... Well, actually, that's not objective at all, considering my passionate love for the Lord of the Rings universe and everything related to it. But this cartoon is really cool.
+ Owls are like cats, only birds. Amazing graphics, design, atmosphere, everything.
- Well, I don't know, everything seems cool, but something seems off. Oh, and there's also a hint of a sequel, but there isn't one. That's disappointing.
= 9/10, amazing, but not a 10. I felt like humanizing all the characters, but something's off, they're fine as owls.
А, вот почему.
🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕