AmberSoler
Auto-translated
Let's just evaluate all three options in terms of how they reflect the actual state of affairs... It is obvious that your option and the one I proposed (with a correction) are essentially the same thing... Only my version is adapted to the rating calculation rules, namely—the leader receives 100 points, and the others are calculated relative to them...
That means two options remain—mine and Iron's (a classic of the genre :D)...
Which one is closer to reality? Second place trails first by only one point... On what basis can we create a gap of four or five points between them? The current blitz rating more fully reflects the merits of each player, and therefore, recalculating it BASED ONLY on the position taken (without considering relative placement) is inappropriate...
I hope we don't create the preconditions for another argument over nothing.
That means two options remain—mine and Iron's (a classic of the genre :D)...
Which one is closer to reality? Second place trails first by only one point... On what basis can we create a gap of four or five points between them? The current blitz rating more fully reflects the merits of each player, and therefore, recalculating it BASED ONLY on the position taken (without considering relative placement) is inappropriate...
I hope we don't create the preconditions for another argument over nothing.
