now, read the first messages from Dark and mine. He categorically refuses to continue the game because there is no save before the battle, demanding at least a judgment. And this is after I initially wrote that the judges should thoroughly analyze my move to dispel your quite reasonable doubts.
And how should I react when I am accused of cheating out of nowhere? I responded to you quite calmly.
I wish the same in private correspondence.
and not only with Dark.
....in light of the above, I believe it is wrong to allow a replay of the entire move, the identity of which cannot be verified. Therefore, I am appealing to you.
In case the situation cannot be resolved, I am ready for a judgment.
and not a tech loss as a last resort, but specifically a judgment.
and I wasn't accused of cheating (because no objective arguments were gathered for this), but there was a quite reasonable fear that you might take advantage of the situation along with the information you received; the temptation to do so, unfortunately, is too great.
but still, it seems that I have found a way to relieve the burden on the AK, which it is not very eager to take on. It's strange that none of the AK members looked in that direction.
(the requirement to have an autosave before battles, in addition to daily saves, I hope, will not be too difficult to implement))
so:
after that disconnection, Dark did not save the game in single-player mode, but a new day started for him, so there should be an autosave of the new day.
if necessary, after the end of the game and the exchange of passwords, it will be possible to calculate how much money and resources each player had at the time of the 2nd final, compare it with the amount of money that will be in the replay, and draw some conclusions.
I am just letting you know about this so that the situation does not drag on, because the deadlines for the round have already been extended several times.
P.S.: experiments with disconnections are at least bringing some benefit :D
(с) Roger Zelazny