Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

Okay, if you insist, we can consider this issue in the Arbitration Committee (AK). I'll say right away that it will take some time. But I don't understand the requirements. The judge ruled to continue the game, and you disagree. Okay. So, what do you want? To continue from a save before the battle? There isn't one, and at the moment, the player has no obligation to provide one. A technical loss? On what basis? An award? Again, why suddenly, if there's time to finish the game? If the time is up, then why should the game be awarded in the AK when there are judges? State your requirements, and then it will be considered.