Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

Auto-translated

Sanin

Regarding the awarding of the victory, it's an obvious manipulation, as far as I know. Based on the current game situation, the victory will most likely be awarded to the Dark faction. I want to cite a recent example of a victory being awarded: a game in OFB against Jaris, in which I was losing strategically and had no desire to continue playing. However, the organizer told me that the beginning of the second month was too early for awarding the victory, and he scheduled an odd game twice, only agreeing to award the victory on turn 247. Why would they force players to play until the third month in one tournament, and award the victory at the end of the first month in another?

The reason is that in your example, there was still time to finish the game, which is why your request for an awarded victory was denied. However, here, all deadlines have already been missed, so for me personally (as an interested party), the most optimal outcome would be either finishing the game today or awarding the victory, or a coin toss if no winner can be determined by awarding the victory. We will analyze the game after it's finished. There is no question of replaying the game.

Ася 390383586

Осень-Зима 2013-14.

Reading content in

Interface language

Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.