Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
p.s. Ah, it would be better if "all games were Necropolis against another town." Or even better - since we're playing a Bo3 - we could have the first two games be Necropolis against a different town, and if it's 1:1, then the deciding game is Necropolis against Necropolis. The tournament would be incomparably more informative. The nuances of choosing a template and the opposing town in the first two games can be figured out a bit more.
Here are some ideas on how to implement the town selection: Necropolis eliminates a couple of castles; then the template is chosen; then Necropolis's opponent chooses a castle from the remaining six. Of course, there's still more to think about. But playing the entire tournament Necropolis against Necropolis in order to get closer to the answer - what place it holds in the town ranking - is not the most optimal way to find the answer. :confused:
The goal is not to determine what place Necropolis holds in the ranking. At least, it's impossible to do that within a single tournament. The goal is to practice playing with this town, to feel its strengths and weaknesses, to understand its typical development pace.