Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Please register me for the tournament.
P.S. It would be better if "all games were Necropolis against another town."
Or even better - since we're playing a best-of-three - we could have:
the first two games - each player plays Necropolis against a different town, and if it's 1:1, then the deciding game is Necropolis against Necropolis.The tournament would be incomparably more informative.
We can think a little more about the nuances of choosing the template and the opposing town in the first two games.
Here are some ideas on how to implement the town selection:
Necropolis player eliminates a couple of towns; then the template is chosen; then the opponent of Necropolis chooses a town from the remaining six.
Of course, we need to think about this further. Perhaps it could be different at different stages of the tournament. Closer to the decisive matches, players could play against Necropolis with any town. This would be a kind of test of strength. It's worth considering.
But playing the entire tournament with Necropolis against Necropolis, in order to get closer to answering the question - what place it holds in the town ranking - is not the most optimal way to find the answer. :confused: