This is the reward for brilliant judging of favorites 8?
In general, as long as the AC has such people, such decisions will be the norm. One person, being both a tournament judge and a player, allowed himself to drag a round and the entire tournament for a month, then lost a game and immediately imposed deadlines for the next round — "fair decision", "fair judge". The second one — it's unclear what they're doing here at all, there can be no real benefit from them in judging, the third one sold the game in the CIS and on top of that had the wits to use the hat bug in a tournament game — a true judicial standard. And these are the people making decisions on HeroesWorld now. How could you appoint something that cannot exist:confused: .

Rom, as always, you have so many complaints TO EVERYONE. Have you yourself actually done anything useful? Or at least proposed anything sensible? Don't like the current AC lineup? Which one do you like? For example, I don't see any people who could be added to the AC and who could bring any benefit greater than those currently in the AC. You could add 1-2 people, but that wouldn't change the overall picture. There's a lot I dislike at the moment myself, but given the current reality, I don't see any options.

P.S. If you're dissatisfied with the AC's activities, you can easily express a vote of no confidence. If public opinion shows that the AC's work is unsatisfactory — we easily assemble a new lineup or disband the AC altogether due to irrelevance.

Pit at his best as always, everything is correct, the armies were not revealed, no additional information was obtained, we delete the hero and continue the game.

Seriously? Did you even look at the saves? First of all, Red attacked with an army against Blue, meaning the army was revealed. Secondly, during the dispute, the participants received a lot of information about where which roads lead, where the bugs are, how many secondary skills each player has, etc.
Thirdly, Pit, when making his decision, split his vote 60/40 between continuation and a restart, but since that's not allowed, he chose one option. For those who think this decision was easy — it wasn't easy at all.
And fourthly, there are grounds for a meeting restart. If we consider that the Black Knights guard the passage along the road (and the road leads to Mizrael's respawn), then the passage Dark used is a bugged passage. According to the rules, bugged passages can be used. Therefore, the meeting restart is justified and calling it some kind of "inadequate decision" is definitely wrong.
So, before writing anything, I recommend at least looking at the saves and thinking. This applies to everyone. Therefore, I ask you to stop the dispute. The decision has been made, time is running short.