HeroesWorld
  • Log in
  • Create account
  • Mode
    Interface scale

TOURNAMENT TROUBLES!

Show in topic
User Avatar
Offline IronAxe
Registered:
Posts: 1,495
#186
Auto-translated
AmberSoler;98245
You can simply prohibit destroying the neutral unit that was used to escape (if that unit had a valuable stack that wasn't destroyed and disappeared after the escape procedure). That is, it's up to you to decide whether it's more important to escape and reveal the neutral unit, or to lose the hero/city, but then be able to destroy that neutral unit if it guards a strategic location...
Yes, it's possible, I'm not arguing. But I'm emphasizing that if there's a prohibition in the rules, then the exceptional cases that allow you to use this prohibition MUST BE REFLECTED IN THE RULES. And that's not the case with you.
Therefore, I believe that Ataman's rules regarding the weakening of troops are reflected more accurately.
AmberSoler;98245

It's easy to check - if the player reports in the description that they escaped, indicating where exactly, then you can see these neutral units in the final save, and by performing simple calculations to count the remaining units, you can confirm that everything happened as described... :) But this is such a rare case that I doubt we'll ever see it happen...
I understand that it's easy to check. It's just that many people don't know about the possibility of using the prohibition in exceptional situations. As soon as you clarified the rule on the Blitz, one of the players immediately used it, so why don't you include this clarification in your official rules?
0
⚖️
0
Show in topic