Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Just think about it... If there's no intention to weaken the neutrals so you can defeat them later, then feel free to run away, and let those neutrals stand there until the end of the game... What's the problem? You don't need to think in a шаблонный way; it's just a pseudo-bug, and there's a gentleman's agreement not to abuse it. Nothing bad will happen to the game or the opponent – just like in the case of using the Admiral's Hat on the fourth stage of a blitz game. I had to use it not to gain extra movement points, but to escape to my castle... That's all. The main thing is to justify it.
I understand all of this. But if circumstances force me to first escape from this mixed army and I can explain why, and then I just need to break through and finish off these neutrals, and there will be a justification for everything – does that mean I can, or am I understanding correctly?