IronAxe
Auto-translated
You're so funny... :)
And are you aware, esteemed sir, that after destroying an upgraded stack and subsequently retreating, the problem is not solved because the next attack on this army of neutrals will again include an upgraded stack? And so on, ad infinitum. The presence of upgraded neutrals is determined by the coordinates of the unit. Iron, don't mislead people with the words "if you wish to weaken these monsters in subsequent attacks"... It is impossible to weaken neutrals in this way in any subsequent attacks. This is the essence of the bug - a unit of neutrals can be completely destroyed (!) by attacking it and retreating. Because the upgraded stack will always be there, and the number will decrease by at least 1/7 of the unit after each attack.
-------------------------------------------
You leave your army there, except for the wolf, which doesn't have a penalty on the stones, you free Dessa from the dungeon, and there's enough time to return to the Can to take one fly to take out thirty griffins with magic... We lose Fiura, but then Dessa takes the Can without losses... almost...
------------------------------------------
This is about you weakening troops in the Conservatory in TWO turns. There are also neutrals there, and one slot is upgraded. If everything works differently in the Can, then this point of prohibition still needs to be described in detail. For example, even after your comment and taking into account your walkthrough :smile19: Deleted :smile19:, I don't understand. I naturally don't have time to read all the guides and documents on Heroes, and others may not have time either, so I read the rules carefully before tournaments, and there should be no ambiguities.
Otherwise, some smart guy will destroy the upgraded stack, retreat, and then, with a clear conscience, will use this bug-trick to make his life easier - because they said to destroy it only in the first attack... And then? :)
Amber, what are you trying to portray me as some kind of idiot? Sometimes my results in the third game are better than yours, even though I'm not a specialist in the third game. Therefore, I think my level of play in the third game is more or less decent. But if even I don't understand your rules in the form they are presented, what can be said about others whose level of play is a little lower??? Describe the rules in detail so that even I, a simpleton, can understand them :)