Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

Distorting facts. You definitely knew that I saved the game and sent it to the judge; it's clearly written in our chat log, don't lie. You mentioned your judging in the chat log at least 3 times during the game, and only the first mention about "forcing a trade" doesn't seem like trolling; in all other cases, it's not even close, again, a lie. In short, all the materials are with the judges, and it's up to them to decide.

I won't argue online anymore. Maybe I missed it, but I didn't see in the chat log that you clearly saved the game. Regarding the judges, your previous post implies that I didn't want to negotiate, and you had no choice but to send the save to the judge, which is not the case. You insisted that we turn to the judges for a decision, not wanting to discuss anything other than one possible solution. I, in turn, contacted several judges and sent them all the information, and only after their differing opinions did I, not you, turn to the Arbitration Committee (AK). I think it would be wise for us to end the argument here; it won't affect the AK's decision anyway. I didn't intend to insult you, and I don't intend to now; if it seemed that way, then you misunderstood me. And I have no complaints about you as a person or as a player at the moment.