Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I was thinking that many people will be away for the May holidays, so it would be better to reduce the number of games.
Here's an option for the spring part of the series:
4 groups of 4 people each, a little more or a little less depending on the number of participants, 1 game with each, the stakes for each game are very high, only 2 participants advance from each group! This lasts for a month.
Then, a playoff according to the A1-D2, A2-D1, B1-C2, B2-C1 scheme, 2 games, the first is random, the second is a mirror match, the same map is used for both games, if there's a tie, the player who achieves victory faster wins.
Then, the same scheme is used for the semi-finals and finals, with a break for the May holidays, which is exactly 3 months. In total, a maximum of 9 games.
The groups will be formed based on the principle of "strong player, strong player, average player, newbie" depending on the participants' ratings.
The main focus is on the playoffs, where, in theory, the strongest players should be concentrated.
This is a great scheme, by the way! We should use it.