Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.
Then explain, on what grounds would he appeal the technical support decision by going down?
The idea is that in this case, the AK would not doubt the decision and would immediately issue a technical support ban to Dark.
That is, the meaning of skd's sarcasm was precisely that Dark is now appealing (disputing the decision about) the replay, which you suggested to him. And there, he would be arguing with the technical support ban that the AK would issue to him without much thought.
He would have no grounds, the joke was not about that.