Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

Global

Games

Olden Era

Heroes VII

Heroes VI

Heroes V

Heroes IV

Heroes III

Might&Magic

Heroes II

Heroes I

King's Bounty

H and M&M

Others

Community

Tavern

Town Hall

Roha's tours

Mode

No background Wide layout

Language

Content

Interface

Posts, wiki & tournaments are authored in English & Russian. Site labels translate to your interface choice.

caliban

Registered: 4/4/2016

Posts: 602

#1451 2/9/2017 4:04 PM UTC

Auto-translated

bubuch

Personally, I'm at a dead end. Luckily, I'm not a judge. Now I'm leaning towards:
"What's the problem with allowing a move?
Judging by the screenshot, it's hard to understand where to go."

Added after 39 seconds
This option doesn't seem to infringe on Mizrael's rights

Added after 7 minutes
Obviously, the judge's decision should fully protect Mizrael's interests (since Dark formally violated the rules), but at the same time, Mizrael's interests should not go beyond the bounds of good faith. Here.

Mizrael proposed a compromise – a rematch. LuckyF, in my opinion, described a good similar example, when a player violates the rules on Jebel, mistakenly believing that the opponent's GO is broken and moves into his respawn. And I think there was a similar situation in Path to Olympus, and the game was replayed.
Either rewriting the rules for these situations, or a compromise – replaying the game. IMHO

https://twitch.tv/calibanhw