Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.
I posted 2 screenshots, take a look at them, and tell me if I could have assumed that this wasn't my territory? Considering that the horses are standing on the road, facing the green spawn point, and the opponent has a Castle?! Even if I had the slightest doubt that it wasn't my spawn point, I wouldn't have gone there.
Personally, I wouldn't see anything criminal here. I'm talking about the principle itself; the judge should be guided by their own vision, based on their experience, and considering, to the best of their ability, the moral aspect of the suspect. For example, I wouldn't see anything criminal, or at least it's not obvious, but Sanya thinks it's an easy win. If he were the judge, the decision should be made based on that.