Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Voting for the location of the CIS-2107 tournament.
The principle of differentiation should exist, but not based on money.
And what criteria should be used? If it's based on the number of visits, then it's essentially the same thing (the number of visits indicates that the person is more likely to attend if they vote for a particular option). I agree that if the votes of players and viewers were weighted differently, it would be better, but in the end, the most significant votes in the Volgograd vote belonged to the viewers. Alexxl
As an example, I initially planned to contribute around 100k as a down payment if Volgograd was chosen. So, imagine I create a poll, and also pay for the necessary votes for Volgograd with that money, which is exactly the 100k I initially wanted to contribute.
Well, that means you paid for the conference hall and the tournament buy-in, etc., in case the people you paid the 100k for didn't show up. In other words, for everyone who came from the CIS, it became 100k cheaper. I don't see a problem.
Стримы HMM5 на полных картах мод TE: ru.twitch.tv/noom11
Alex_nv - draw - Vovan112013 летос 236
alex_nv wrote: Наконец то нормальная игра с открытием половины карты.