Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Voting for the location of the CIS-2107 tournament.
The idea of giving different weights to the votes of different players seems unsuccessful to me.
The community lives and develops as long as there is a constant influx of new participants. But if newcomers are immediately told, "your opinion is not very important to us," then enthusiasm noticeably decreases.
In my opinion, it should be exactly the opposite - "we are glad to have all participants." The fact that some percentage of newcomers will drop out in the process is normal. Experienced players also sometimes drop out at the last moment.
Therefore, I propose the following system for counting votes:
tournament participant = 1 vote
tournament viewer = 0.5 votes
If the problem of attendance is really relevant, then introduce a prepayment - something like 20% of the accommodation cost. Accordingly, all those who voted for a specific option agree to make a prepayment. For example, within a week after the voting results are approved.