Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Mizrael may request a respawn on block if there are grounds for it.
Or do a respawn on meeting through an area with 6K passages.
But there is no block here, he's getting by just fine. However, he's getting by while encroaching on the dark respawn. There's a clear oversight in the rules, one that doesn't address the factually bugged generation on SMK, where no GO is generated along the road between respawns — a situation that can nevertheless be ruled on differently at the judges' discretion. And if we're going to nitpick the rules, then in this case dark took the risk of picking up a pile of gold. It could well have been assumed that dark knights should block not only the road but also the pathless area below. So a technical loss could very well be called here — what does rolling back the turn have to do with it? This is roughly akin to a situation on Jebus Cross where it is unclear whether a GO to a side respawn has been broken and whether the opponent has gone there; one can take a risk and bypass a shifted one — if the opponent has already broken through, everything will be fine; if not, then a technical loss...