Voting for the location of the CIS-2107 tournament.

Yes, that's correct, but they don't account for 1/3 of all points.

Could you elaborate on the 1/3? I don't quite understand what you're writing, but I'll try to calculate up to 50. So, if I understand correctly, the argument about 1/3 for Volgograd included Merlin (6) + IDD (6) + Oxygen (6) = 18 / 49.5 = 36.3% of Volgograd's total. For Yekaterinburg, by analogy, it's Mee (5) + Asm (5) + for example, Katya (3) = 13 / 36.4 = 35.7% of Yekaterinburg's total. And by the way, if I calculated correctly, I have a counter-question: why focus on an emotional argument that can be easily verified in both directions? Why not focus on the essence? Even at a glance, there are two possible interpretations of this "essence": 1) Forget about the voting and have those negotiations with the organizers from Volgograd and persuade them to withdraw their application, because if Volgograd withdraws, the vote won't matter (or make sure that this is not a viable idea, and think harder). 2) Look for real flaws in Merlin's weighting system (but this is just a theoretical idea; as an outside, unbiased observer, I don't see any particular flaws. I generally respect weighted voting on a scale of 10 out of 10; the question is in the method of determining the weights themselves, but I haven't delved into that, but it seems more reasonable than Merlin's idea, and no one seems to have proposed a concrete solution)