Voting for the location of the CIS-2107 tournament.

1) You said you weren't ready to be the main organizer, but you were willing to help and contribute financially... so you twisted my words to suit your own purposes, which doesn't reflect well on you.

2) I participated every time I was available, i.e., 5 out of 5 times. As for you, it was 4 out of 6. For example, in 2012, you only participated to ensure an even number of players so that an auction could be held for a free slot in the first round, which is exactly what happened.

1. Why would I need to twist anything? You yourself said that you weren't ready to be the main organizer, as in 2012, which means (translating into Russian) - you weren't ready to take responsibility. And that's what being an organizer means. Agree, helping and being an organizer are different things?

2. So what?

Added 8 minutes later

In fact, besides me, there were 3 other interested people who took the organization and execution very seriously, so please don't say that it was just me and some no-names; the guys really did a great job!

Once again, there are two "L"s in the name "Kirill." :smile08:
I think I already wrote that the word "no-name" is not an insult. "No-name" means unknown, someone who is not known. Mee is known, and if he had written that he was ready to be an organizer, the application would have been more competitive: despite the failed WT project, СНГ-2012 was well-organized and quite good (especially compared to previous ones).
I didn't doubt and don't doubt that Yekaterinburg is capable of hosting the СНГ tournament. Moreover, I was ready to participate myself. But. The vote, which was announced IN ADVANCE, with the algorithm announced IN ADVANCE, took place. None of the dissatisfied people offered an alternative, constructive algorithm for the voting.

Added 13 minutes later

And what about you? Although I wrote about three people (you're twisting things again... that's not good), what about Oxy and DD? They have 0 out of 6 and 0 out of 6.

Did you notice Asma and Katerina? They have 0 out of 5 and 0 out of 3. Num and Kill 'n' Action have 0 and 3, and 0 out of 3.

You need to understand that even if we compare based on the СНГ players who participated, Volgograd is still in the lead. In terms of the total number of tournaments played among those who voted, Volgograd is still in the lead.
And in this case, it's an objective vote. The fact that you don't like the results is probably unpleasant for you. But to look for artificial reasons for this, and even more so to do it publicly on the forum, is somehow childish...