Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Well, such decks probably exist in every CCG. In Hearthstone – Dashas and aggro-vampires, in Star Crusade – face-hogs and buff-hierarchs. As always, there will be those who enjoy playing them.
Deck building has no sense
I don’t know, I don’t know. Of course, it’s hard to come up with something stronger than aggro-shaman, but in terms of fun decks and interesting, significant changes in top-tier decks, something new appears constantly. The same token/Malygos druid, which was a strong archetype for a long time, was created only a couple of months after the expansion.
Niche decks
Are niche decks like highly specialized ones? So, what makes Frizzlemage not a niche deck? It crushes certain archetypes, but gets crushed by others.
just one playable archetype per class
Control, C’Thun, tempo, dragon, OTK, face, and patron/fatigue warriors from the time of Old Gods are laughing at this statement. Although now the diversity within the class is small, I agree.
art is childish boring filler cards
Well, I’ll agree with these two points. Although I’ve gotten used to the art design and perceive it as part of the game’s atmosphere, the dull cards that were intended to be unplayable (as Brode said directly) annoy me a little.