Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Regardless, I'm talking about their stats, not about which unit is available earlier or which one can be produced in greater numbers. For example: High Elves are easily defeated by Cerberuses, and even Dragonflies, so if we're talking about which unit is more effective in the early stages of the game, then it's clear, and as for the stats, I'm sorry, they just don't compare favorably.
Yes, Cerberuses and Dragonflies will defeat Elves... there's nothing you can do about it... But aren't Nagas, Champions, or Death Knights superior to Cyclops? Now the comparison has shifted to who will win: Archers or Footmen... and not Archers versus Archers.