Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I read the forum, but I didn't delve into the details. Try creating a separate rating for each player. In any case, "old" players shouldn't be ranked higher in the current rating than "active" players (if a player, for example, played 2 years ago), because it's impossible to determine their current strength. Ideally, there should be two ratings (as was done in RTA): a current rating with a gradual (rather than a sharp, as in the League) decrease in the rating of inactive players, and an "all-time" rating where players' ratings are calculated based on their wins in all tournaments. I understand that the second option will only be interesting to enthusiasts, but in general, create both options and show how they would look in the end. For current tournaments, Vip's rating is quite suitable.