Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Well, yes... we were playing on version 3.2, and there's no such bug there, so I, for example, didn't even think about it and don't plan to... ;) And regarding different versions, you either need to play on the same version, or everyone should be prohibited from using this bug, because otherwise everyone will be in different conditions => they will show different results... IMHO.
Currently, playing on both versions is ALLOWED. We've already discussed switching to one version, and the organizers ALLOWED playing on different versions. Now, if you manage to ensure that this bug-feature cannot be used by those with version 3.0, then at the same time, ensure that on version 3.2, it is NOT POSSIBLE to get out of the boat while wearing the captain's hat on the same turn you boarded the boat. Otherwise, players on version 3.0 will no longer be on equal footing with you :) Because then, to avoid using this bug-feature, it would be impossible to get out of the boat on version 3.0 on the same turn you boarded while wearing the hat. But on version 3.2, it would be possible? Where are the equal conditions?
Added 11 minutes ago Kamikaze;96754
Iron, what are you talking about? It's not my fault that you have a version of the game with bugs.
I consider these to be features, not bugs, and I don't care what version of the game you have.Kamikaze;96754
Why should I only use them just because you have an older version?
Because it's ALLOWED to play on it. The organizer gave an explanation about the expediency, and you were silent then, and now you're picking on me :) You should have complained earlier. We're talking about Radic's result - whether it's fair or not. I think it's all fair. And if I had figured it out, I would have used it too, BECAUSE IT WAS ALLOWED! Do you understand that or not?Kamikaze;96754
The developers fixed it. That means it's a bug. What does expediency have to do with it? And Radic has nothing to do with it; we're looking at the situation.
The developers think they fixed it, but in reality, they introduced a new bug :) And I'm looking at the situation using Radic as an example. He did everything right. Well done. And everyone is on equal footing. Because the organizers don't prohibit playing on 3.0. Those with 3.2 can also play on that version :) It's not prohibited.Kamikaze;96754
No, my friend, it won't work that way. You're completely wrong here!
I don't care if it works or not; go argue with the organizers, not with me :) For now, things are going exactly as I described. P.S. Half of the participants are playing on 3.0, and half on 3.2. And no one wants or can switch to another version. What's the solution? You often give advice about better map design, so here's a suggestion: remove the hat from the map, and everyone will be on equal footing regarding this bug-feature.