Sacred Haven of Debauchery

It would seem that I should already be used to the fact that most people have their heads filled with nonsense, but, I must admit, I was in for a rather unpleasant surprise in the last contest. I can still understand those who didn't like the fact that there was nudity – after all, not everyone enjoys the sight of a female body, and in our liberal and progressive age, everyone can have their own preferences, and they shouldn't be judged in any way. But those who saw pedophilia – guys, you have serious problems. Yes, you do, not me. Here is a child. Here is a child, even the card says so. Here is definitely a child. And here is also a child. Now, let's compare this again with this image. Is there a difference? In my opinion, yes. If, in your opinion, there isn't, please make a collage of this and any of the four images above and show me the similarities, because I don't see them at all. I won't even mention that, personally for me, one of the reasons why I considered determining the age of an anime girl to be a completely idiotic exercise – but I see that many people here think it's important – is the fact that it's obvious that only a sick pervert would draw erotically depicted children and add them to a card game. It simply didn't occur to me that an erotically depicted girl could be a child. In other words, if you really, without joking, saw pedophilia in this picture, you should think about your own repressed desires and fears, because it has long been known that people very often see what they want to see because of their own preferences. For example, many considered Loras from Game of Thrones to be gay, although there wasn't much reason for it, but those who wanted to see hints of it did. Yes, I sent the picture without any ulterior motive, I didn't expect it to cause such harsh accusations from so many people. And yes, I also didn't pay attention to the fact that there was nudity, I thought that maybe the card was supposed to be like that.