Драккошка
Auto-translated
1 - 8. Cool, but I don't like the shape of the eyes and the shape of the chest.
2 - 7. It looks a bit blurry.
3 - 6. No, it's not my style.
4 - 6. Plus for the cool image, but the face didn't turn out well.
5 - 3. Plus two points for the fact that I like this card in its normal form. And yes, call it "clov."
6 - 7. Plus for the interesting technique.
7 - 7. Minus for the graininess and for the fact that it looks more like a photoshopped photo. I don't like photo art. Even if it's beautiful.
8 - 5. The face didn't turn out well.
9 - 8. Simple and tasteful. It caught my eye at first glance.
10 - 7. It's a bit static and lacks something special, but it's cute.
11 - 8. Not my style, but it's cool, even though it's still blurry.
12 - 7. What's with all the criticism? The face isn't very visible, it's not a human female, so what? I like it.
2 - 7. It looks a bit blurry.
3 - 6. No, it's not my style.
4 - 6. Plus for the cool image, but the face didn't turn out well.
5 - 3. Plus two points for the fact that I like this card in its normal form. And yes, call it "clov."
6 - 7. Plus for the interesting technique.
7 - 7. Minus for the graininess and for the fact that it looks more like a photoshopped photo. I don't like photo art. Even if it's beautiful.
8 - 5. The face didn't turn out well.
9 - 8. Simple and tasteful. It caught my eye at first glance.
10 - 7. It's a bit static and lacks something special, but it's cute.
11 - 8. Not my style, but it's cool, even though it's still blurry.
12 - 7. What's with all the criticism? The face isn't very visible, it's not a human female, so what? I like it.
А, вот почему.
🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕