Ophelia and Aravella. The latter, it seems, is a liar after all
Lady Aravella. Inactive. In her favor is the opinion of some of our respected citizens, whom I am inclined to trust. Against her—her inactivity and the block of the second night.
Lady Aravella... More distrust now due to their lower activity; they could simply be cautious conspirators.
It bothers me how easily Sir Navirus is going. Although I have already observed cases where exposed scoundrels went to the chopping block without issue, I am not sure this is a case where they might not care about him, since they now have every chance to defeat us. Given how openly Lady Ormhild announced her capabilities to everyone, I don't think it cost the scoundrels much to lead her away from the right target for the sake of disinformation. On the other hand, it's somehow strange on their part, not knowing who she would go to, to give her the chance to visit one of them and still receive negative indicators. After all, there is a high probability that she could have targeted another maf and ended up getting the correct status. But at the same time, the game might be worth the candle according to their logic. But the way Navirus goes so easily without resistance also does not please me.
I will not believe that a city translation was directed toward her. It would be foolish, seeing her presumed role, to disinform her so pointlessly.
Since my role does not possess revealing information, the crazy one seemed like a negative to me, while I tried to believe the brave knight unconditionally; I don't particularly trust my intuition regarding affiliation. I can say that from the start of the game, our king has made me nervous, just as his sister did. But judging by her easy disappearance and the fact that no one really worried about her, I am readily prepared to believe that she was one of us. And therefore, it is difficult for me to brazenly and groundlessly accuse His Majesty. I also don't quite like: Lady Amael, Sir Gor. There is a slight shadow of doubt over the images of Selenid and Tizetria. Aris is a murky, unpleasant type who has lost interest in the life of the city. To some extent, one can understand him, but I do not like such behavior. I will believe Ormhild until city number eight surfaces, proving that Sir Richard was the checker. Given the circumstances, I see practically no grounds not to trust Lady Ophelia. At the same time, I want to scold the city shooter, if he is alive, for inaction, or the doctor, for saving an unlikely negative. But I still prefer to believe Ophelia; her rhetoric is quite peaceful and positive, as is Ormhild's. But in my experience, without sufficient information, it is hard to judge a city game if many negatives are capable of masterfully posing as good guys.
Now I've reread the discussions (I didn't erase anything) and thought, perhaps our king is a good guy after all. Then the most suspicious people for me are: Gor, Aris, Amael, Navirus. With a certain probability, Ophelia is a maf, but it's not absolute. If she is a scoundrel, then the successful treatment by our medic only benefited the negatives. Also, I won't rule out that the king's sister was bad, and our GM simply decided not to bother with a replacement (but I still believe more in her being peaceful). I want to believe Selenid and Tizetria only by intuition (i.e., everything is shaky and unfounded), and Ormhild only because of open hints about a role, which might not even have been helpful.
I'm not casting a vote for now. I'm afraid to risk it, even though we've practically lost the city.
Considering the experience of previous games, I advise against jumping on low-activity people. I remind you that in the last game, some of the most active were the scoundrels who brazenly manipulated the city. And that same lazy Wish turned out to be the main city. It's just that for some, real-life circumstances are a huge hindrance. It sucks that because of this I have to reveal my IRL identity. But this lack of understanding is infuriating.