Execute MasteR - 4 votes (RiMpel2, Neira Drake, Heroist, KindShaman)
Execute RiMpel2 - 3 votes (Fragment, Yuuhei, MasteR)
Execute KindShaman - 1 vote (Uranium235)
No Vote - 1 vote (WishmasteR)
6 votes are needed for an execution.
No one was executed. The day is closed.
However, it seems that those who are being targeted are those who are undesirable to RiMpel, judging by this voting pattern.
Also, there's a non-obvious RiMpel-Fragment pair. I think it's quite obvious, so there must be one innocent among them.
And Fragment is exhibiting typical behavior of a town checker, I must admit.
Let's look further. In this game, who has been targeted besides Ment (and even that was based on overly obvious evidence)? Me, Shaman, and RiMpel. The results of the checkers shouldn't be so bad that not even one mafia member is brought up for a vote. I know it's not me.
Apparently, I'm ready to support RiMpel - if the checkers made bad checks or their results were constantly altered by madness, we won't win this game anyway. So, we need to assume that at least some of the checks were accurate and led to at least some negative votes for execution.
Execute RiMpel
Added 2 minutes ago
But in the message I quoted, it clearly stated five, I don't know. Or did only the "chosen ones" possess this secret information?
Initially, I was considering one, but even if there are two, there is still someone else for whom it makes no sense to create a balance in votes between two innocents; it's not that kind of situation, and they don't lose anything if they add a vote to you.
I also think that at least one mafia member definitely added a vote to me. And it's much more likely to be you than Fragment.
Added 43 seconds ago
Heroist, and tell me, do you agree with my version of the living innocents in the game:
Fritjof, the cook, and 2 checkers?
Added 4 minutes ago
But in the message I quoted, it clearly stated five, I don't know.
In other words, the same question: "how many votes were needed for an execution yesterday, 4 or 5"?