Discussion about Heroes 4.

I don't level up resistance because it's an extra five skills, and there's already a lot to learn. Plus, magic resistance isn't required in every battle and can be easily replaced with antimagic if needed.
Melee and ranged combat skills might not be necessary in themselves, but they are needed to level up combat, which significantly increases survivability, and this is relevant for a solo hero.

As for liches and vampires, you're saying something strange. You've already been told that undead and vampirism are not the same thing. A lich is simply undead, while a vampire is undead that possesses vampirism. It would be stupid to take that away from them; it contradicts the very logic of this unit.

Antimagic and resistance are slightly different things. Antimagic immediately removes all previously applied blessings and consumed potions, and you won't be able to heal wounds. Also, if the enemy gets a morale boost and casts a spell first, it will be too late to use antimagic.
Melee and ranged combat skills are NOT needed to level up combat. Nor are they needed to level up resistance.

A lich, or dead sorcerer, can also be translated as a leech (which sucks blood:mad: :D). But in the fourth game, a lich is not a monster or undead, as in the third game, but a hero, just like a death knight (dead knight, zombie). Although it's unlikely you'll find healing near the Necropolis, as far as I remember, its heroes don't behave like undead – their morale changes (this is for sure) and so on:smile24:

Added after 51 minutes

...knowing that the development was overseen by the Jews from Ubisoft, for whom the Heroes series has long ceased to be a priority, and they didn't have the most diligent approach to its development...

Now it's clear where it all comes from. Before Ubisoft appeared, the Heroes games were intuitively understandable, and then some perversions began – and I somehow didn't immediately realize that those who only have a diligent approach to making money were involved in this.