One for all and all for one 5

When I suggested choosing captains from a list of candidates and ranking them based on their skill level – which is the most objective approach – no one who responded in the thread agreed with me. Now you're saying that a list of captains chosen by voting will be subjective, and the number of votes won't reflect the actual skill ranking, which is obvious, if not to everyone, then to most :smile32:. In reality, if a certain number of participants decide to have some fun with the voting, we'll end up with a completely absurd list. All that's left is to mathematically justify what percentage of participants need to do that :D.