Skip to content

BLITZ TOURNAMENT

User Avatar
#617
Auto-translated
IronAxe;94392
:) It would be interesting to see a link to my post with a silly statement.
Well, for example, when you were arguing with AmberSoler about "features" and "bugs." That's silly. In general, AmberSoler, in my opinion, made it clear what, how, and why. How even a child can distinguish between these two incomparable things, and you argued until the very end.
IronAxe;94392
:) You said that a player-organizer can see the best result and make the same one. This is practically a falsification of the result. That's one.

This is not one. To forge and improve a result are completely different things. What's not clear here? Did I accuse anyone of falsification?
IronAxe;94392
:) Nevertheless, he is the one who creates the tasks, and what do you think - when creating tasks, doesn't he even know an approximate solution? At the very least, he probably has to check them for the possibility of completion. But I repeat - this is not a reason to exclude organizers from the tournament. After all, he still completes his own walkthrough. That's two.

This is not two, and not even one. What does it matter that he creates and designs tasks for us? If you read my post carefully, you can see that I didn't mean that at all. That he creates and participates - please, it doesn't bother me at all, especially since, as the first stage showed, AmberSoler's result was far from the best. Besides, I didn't say that "this is a reason to exclude organizers from the tournament." Read more carefully.
IronAxe;94392
:) And it's bad that Kyle is not participating in the tournament. This tournament is planned to be a ranked one. On what basis should Kyle be deprived of part of his rating, which he could have earned, especially since some existing rating systems are cyclical and cumulative. The tournament organizer only sees the final saves that may be obtained on the last day of the official end of the tournament. What is unfair about this? He is unlikely to artificially improve his result in one day with the introduction of a preliminary stage, and he wouldn't even do it. That's three and four combined.

And what does this have to do with it at all? If he participated, then maybe it would be worth continuing, but as it is, I didn't say anything about Kyle.
IronAxe;94392
:) PS. For your information, the issue of organizers participating in the tournament has already been raised somewhere on the forum, and if I remember correctly, this issue was resolved positively. Why Kyle is not participating in the blitz, I don't know, but it is his right, as he also has the right to participate in it.

And for your information, is there any point in arguing with each other about this? Maybe we should have a duel? In my opinion, this is also silly.
But, still, I don't regret asking such a question.

P.S. I hope I didn't offend you personally. Sincerely, Ley.
"Единственное, что можно сказать с уверенностью об удаче - она изменит..."