Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Strongly disagree, I have nothing to add. Everything has been explained clearly. From your previous posts, it's clear that you like to express your opinion and stick to it at all costs (even through arguments, sometimes even silly ones), well, that's your right.
:) I would also be interested in seeing a link to my post with the silly statement. Ley;94369
I didn't say, and certainly didn't accuse, that the organizers are "falsifying" the results - that's one.
Well, you said that a playing organizer could see a better result and replicate it. This is practically falsifying the result. That's one.Ley;94369
Secondly, I apologized to AmberSoler.
Nevertheless, he is the one who creates the puzzles, and what do you think - when creating the puzzles, doesn't he even know an approximate solution? At the very least, he probably has to check them for the possibility of being solved. But I'll say it again - this is not a reason to exclude organizers from the tournament. After all, he still completes his own Walkthrough. That's two.Ley;94369
Thirdly, it would indeed be unfair if the organizer-participant in the tournament could see all the saves. Fourthly, Kyle has now explained to me that only he can see the saves before the results are published, and he is not participating in the tournament. So I have no more questions for the organizers on this topic.
Well, it's a pity that Kyle is not participating in the tournament. This tournament is planned to be a ranked one. On what basis should Kyle be deprived of part of his rating, which he could have earned, especially since some existing rating systems are cyclical and cumulative. The tournament organizer only sees the final saves that may be obtained on the last day of the official end of the tournament. What is unfair about that? He is unlikely to rig his result in one day with a preliminary entry, and he wouldn't even do it. That's three and four combined. PS. For your information, the issue of organizers participating in the tournament has already been raised somewhere on the forum, and if I remember correctly, this issue was resolved positively. Why Kyle is not participating in the blitz, I don't know, but it is his right, just as he has the right to participate in it.