Forum

Ah, so you're talking about that situation in the Academy. Lol, I just can't stand by when I see blatant injustice. I sympathized with Hell's position, so I supported him in that particular situation. If I thought his opponent was right, I would have supported The.

So, the blatant injustice in the previous match towards The was to your liking? :D I wouldn't really argue with the second decision. But with the first one... After the first incident, that decision was, to put it mildly, unfair, and I wouldn't call everyone who lobbied in favor of Hell honest people. And the Academy's decision on the first match, which so blatantly contradicts the rule of fair play that bribing players pales in comparison. And in all these decisions (including the brilliant decision in the Num-Lizard match, which was of course reviewed), the same person is involved in the judging of the CIS region. Can you guess who? He's protecting your good name here.