Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Let's put an end to this pointless discussion. I've already said that I wouldn't have supported the Silent Hill approach in this case, but when the "alleged" violation occurred – in my opinion, it didn't warrant a technical defeat, let alone a replay – the player Wowa took the game passwords and confirmed his defeat through technical means. By doing so, he agreed to the result. To put it another way, if player Wowa had saved the game during the violation and while talking to his opponent, and then contacted the tournament judges, he would have almost certainly avoided a technical defeat. :smile13: So, in the future, in controversial situations, contact the tournament judges, as Sladyish already mentioned above:cool: