Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Here's a simple example: in the past, OzV took Javdet as the second player on his team, and I lost all the games. If he had taken me as the third player, I would have shown a good result.
What prevented him from immediately taking a stronger player for the second slot? I think this example is more of an exception, as reasonable captains should first take stronger players. If you allow picking weaker players first and then swapping them with stronger ones, it will lead to everyone trying to immediately choose a "newcomer" who is stronger, because players in the middle tiers are approximately at the same level. This will add even more imbalance in team strengths. Not to mention that such "miscalculations" will significantly extend the draft time. Everything should be simple: you see the strongest player – you take him. In the last tournament, it worked best: one common pool, and you take whoever you think is stronger. For example, Stinger thought he had "luckily snatched" Andres.