bdd
Auto-translated
I'm not against cheats. When a person pays for a license, they aren't selling themselves into slavery or signing an employment contract. The main goal of the game is to have fun. And if the game doesn't bring joy, that's not good at all.
Everyone has their own idea of enjoyment from a game, and I don't understand Nival's action. Was it really so hard to include cheats in the game?
After all, there is an airtight argument—those who want to cheat should cheat,
and the hardcore players can complete it completely honestly. Why was I deprived of the ability to play through already completed Campaigns missions a 2nd time with a map hack cheat? This is completely pointless! I've already beaten them!
P.S. On some forum, I saw that community modders have already learned how to call up the console and cheat in it. I haven't tried it myself, but nevertheless, a fact remains a fact. Was it worth it for Nival to mock gamers like this if loopholes remained in the game and there is artmoney? In effect, the company isn't opposing cheating, but rather facilitating the hacking of its own game, which is much worse!
Everyone has their own idea of enjoyment from a game, and I don't understand Nival's action. Was it really so hard to include cheats in the game?
After all, there is an airtight argument—those who want to cheat should cheat,
and the hardcore players can complete it completely honestly. Why was I deprived of the ability to play through already completed Campaigns missions a 2nd time with a map hack cheat? This is completely pointless! I've already beaten them!
P.S. On some forum, I saw that community modders have already learned how to call up the console and cheat in it. I haven't tried it myself, but nevertheless, a fact remains a fact. Was it worth it for Nival to mock gamers like this if loopholes remained in the game and there is artmoney? In effect, the company isn't opposing cheating, but rather facilitating the hacking of its own game, which is much worse!