Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I'll take a look and search for my old lectures. I seem to have misplaced my notebook somewhere too; I didn't think I would have to talk about this. But I want to quote a work published back in 1986 edited by Yu.V. Bromley (History of Primitive Society. Era of the Primitive Tribal Community. Moscow, 1986, pages 368-369). In response to claims about matriarchy based on the discovery of female sculptures: "Firstly, numerous ethnographic materials allow for a wide variety of interpretations of these figurines, even if one proceeds from their cult purpose. Secondly, the emergence of belief in a female deity as a symbol of fertility is possible even in a patrilineal society, examples of which are known among Papuans. Finally, thirdly, there are no rigid links between the high social status of women and the form of tribal organization."