Kamikaze
Auto-translated
Oh my god, what a fuss.
I wasn't even trying to accuse anyone, I just pointed out a small oversight (maybe one of the opponents didn't know about the rule, but that's unlikely).
In this situation, if no one objects, then attacking on any map is basically allowed. For example, one player runs towards a castle (thinking it's the sixth day), and gets attacked and defeated, and as a result, the attacker captures the castle (and it's not allowed to take it for another two days), but he would have captured it first! But if no one objects, then everything is legal, maybe they agreed to fight, who would forbid them.
I wasn't even trying to accuse anyone, I just pointed out a small oversight (maybe one of the opponents didn't know about the rule, but that's unlikely).
In this situation, if no one objects, then attacking on any map is basically allowed. For example, one player runs towards a castle (thinking it's the sixth day), and gets attacked and defeated, and as a result, the attacker captures the castle (and it's not allowed to take it for another two days), but he would have captured it first! But if no one objects, then everything is legal, maybe they agreed to fight, who would forbid them.