Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
He's a punk. He doesn't like Leonardo :-) Da Vinci doesn't have to be liked by everyone. If the punk got moral satisfaction and no one was harmed, what's the problem? P.S. This is not spam or off-topic; it's a veiled discussion of cheats.
He's a pervert! You say no one was harmed? What about the Mona Lisa? Or, since it's an inanimate object, can you do whatever you want with it? And what about Leonardo's fans? They won't be happy about this! I don't agree with this approach.
In principle, this can be called art, albeit incomplete, like painting or music, but still!!!
No, it's complete and no worse than others; it just appeared very recently (by these standards), and that's why many people haven't appreciated or understood it. Everything will come with time...
Well, if a man says "we need to cheat," I can't stay silent. I'll go yell on the balcony.