The result – a technical draw of 1-1 without a game – I wouldn't even consider it, as the game didn't take place. Why should players receive points? If such a rule is allowed, there will be many such results through agreements between participants who have lost their chances of qualifying, and, most dangerously, between participants at the very top of the table.

And what is the danger in this? I really don't understand why, in chess, in Swiss and round-robin tournaments, it is considered normal for leading grandmasters to play e2-e4 and then immediately offer a draw, agreeing if both are satisfied with the result, while in our case, only recently and according to the judges, is a draw possible? On what basis can you force people to play a game to the bitter end if both are satisfied with a draw? Either ban draws as a phenomenon in Heroes, or stop coming up with nonsense and allow them at any moment by mutual agreement of the players.