I would like to know on what grounds the honorable judge granted me a technical defeat in the game against Andreas???...
We repeatedly arranged to meet with the opponent to play the map, but unfortunately, when I arrived for the meeting, I was informed that my opponent could only play after 2-3 hours...
We arranged to meet to complete our game on 05.08.2016 at 19:00. By chance, my opponent showed up 30 minutes earlier, knowing that I was coming to work at exactly 19:00 and asked if I could continue... I arrived as agreed, but after waiting for 2 hours, I returned to work because Andres was nowhere to be found.
When the time for the round was ending, I checked ICQ and saw that my opponent was online. I asked him if we were going to finish the game, and he replied that he was playing now and couldn't manage it today: D
So, again, I'm asking what grounds the judge used to give me a default or a technical defeat in the game that I wanted to finish, while my opponent went to play the seasonal tournament for himself????
If what Yaris wrote is true, and I can say that he is constantly online and ready to play every day, then even though I don't care about him as a person, and Andres is my good friend (although it is often difficult to coordinate with him, just like with my friend Cobra), I am on Yaris's side! However, I don't know why such a decision was made; maybe there was simply a losing situation... If what Yaris wrote is true, and I can say that he is online all day and ready to play for many hours, I'm not his friend, but Andres is my true fellow (and sometimes it is difficult to get him like my friend KobRa) - I have the Yaris side!.. By true I don't know the situation in the game, may be there was a worth position that's why it could be such a decision..