Auto-translated
I can't stand the fourth game. I just feel sick from the disgustingly drawn units, buildings, and heroes, from the clumsy animation, from the completely talentless city design. In the third game, every city looks natural (well, not counting the rather superfluous Conflux), the cities are successfully integrated into the landscape, they are drawn realistically - compare with the haphazardly painted ridiculous buildings in the fourth game, stuck without any connection to the terrain.
I have nothing against a hero on the battlefield, this idea has merit, but then the game shouldn't be called Heroes.
Heroes 1, 2, 3, V – these are all the same game with changing details, but with an unchanged essence. Heroes 4 is a completely different game that has little in common with the other Heroes games.
In general, we can talk about this for a long time, but judging by everything, YOU DON'T KNOW HOW TO PLAY the fourth game AT ALL, because you say such things, or you simply REFUSE to accept positive things, but AGREE to accept negative ones.:mad:
P.S. Sorry, but it just slipped out... *no comment"
Added 1 minute ago
you’re wrong, everything is done well in the fourth game, it’s a little different, but it’s Heroes, with a capital H, only not “H” =) The graphics are normal, yes, and the houses/buildings are nothing, although they at least took the harpies from Dungeon and made them look younger)
In short, don’t ignore the fourth game:smile19:
:D