Феанор
Auto-translated
I can't stand the fourth installment. I simply can't stand the disgustingly drawn units, buildings, and heroes, the awkward animation, and the completely talentless city layouts. In the third game, each city looks natural (well, not counting the rather superfluous Conflux), the cities are successfully integrated into the landscape, and they are drawn realistically – compare this to the fourth game's haphazardly drawn, absurd buildings, stuck in without any connection to the terrain.
I have nothing against the hero on the battlefield; this idea has merit, but then the game shouldn't be called Heroes.
Heroes 1, 2, 3, and V are the same game with changing details, but with an unchanged essence. Heroes 4 is a completely different game, having little in common with the other Heroes
I have nothing against the hero on the battlefield; this idea has merit, but then the game shouldn't be called Heroes.
Heroes 1, 2, 3, and V are the same game with changing details, but with an unchanged essence. Heroes 4 is a completely different game, having little in common with the other Heroes
